![]() Directivity Adjust / Silent Mode / Peaking / Histogram / Guide Line / Frame Maker / Zebra Pattern / Monochrome Live View / Constant Preview / Live View Boost / Rec Area / Step Zoom / Zoom Speed / Sensitivity / White Balance / AF Mode/MF / Drive Mode / Rec/Playback Switch / Off / Restore to Default Digital Zoom / Stabiliser / E-Stabilisation (Video) / 4K Live Cropping / Snap Movie / Motion Pic. Shtr Speed / HDR / Shutter Type / Flash Mode / Flash Adjust. Style / AF/AE LOCK / AF-ON / Preview / One Push AE / Touch AE / Level Gauge / Focus Area Set / Zoom Control / Operation Lock / Focus Ring Lock / Dial Operation Switch / Photo Style / Filter Effect / Aspect Ratio / Picture Size / Quality / Metering Mode / Burst Rate / Self Timer / Live View Composite / Bracket / Focus Mode / Highlight Shadow / i. Wi-Fi / Q.MENU / Video Record / LVF/Monitor Switch / LVF/Monitor Disp. I'm not a Photoshop/Lightroom user so that's all that I know by Googling about.4K PHOTO / Exposure Comp. In fact, Lightroom uses the same underlying processing engine as Camera Raw, which delivers consistent and compatible results across Adobe applications." If you work with raw format photographs in Photoshop or Adobe Bridge, you use Camera Raw to achieve the same kinds of editing as you would in Lightroom. How does Lightroom 3 work with Adobe Camera Raw? Maybe Lightroom is different, but I suspect the same engine would be there but maybe with nicer sliders to play with. ![]() Visit the Camera Raw page for a complete list of supported cameras."Īnd makes me believe that the same conversion engine is used most places. This new version of the Camera Raw plug-in replaces the original one that was installed with Adobe Photoshop CS5, Adobe Photoshop Elements 9 and Adobe Premiere Elements 9 software. Well, I'm guessing that this statement explains it. Wuld be nice to find out I was wrong, because elements suits my needs better than light room if that is the case I have read that the ACR in Elements is not the same as Lifhtroom - it's like "ACR Lite". I think too many people use RAW as a crutch to fix mistakes that were avoidable at time of capture, instead of as a whetstone to hone the picture to the finest edge. Or books/videos/tuition to learn about composition, exposure, etc I respectfully suggest that we focus on helping him make the best of that choice and not criticize his choice.įor a "super amateur photographer" the money is probably better spent on gas or airfare to take more pictures. I believe that it's each person's right to choose the solution for themselves. Want control of my images, not the camera. Why let the camera's dinky processors sharpen your JPEGs for you? That's an automatic transmission approach. I'd rather let a sophisticated conversion engine like Lightroom or Photoshop (or other fine editing tools) manipulate the image I don't buy the argument that a camera's JPEG should give you final pic out of the camera. But if your shooting crap in RAW, you'll still end up with crap no matter what you do. More latitude to rescue images that cannot be rescued when shooting JPEGs. It has nothing to do with being a crutch. are isįor the vast majority of cameras, shooting RAW will give you a better base for the resulting images. I agree that learning to capture better images and gaining skills in composition, exposure, etc. I use HDRist on Mac for producing HDR JPEGs. I am not sure if that makes any difference. As I am super amateur photographer, I don't know the difference between my free Silkypix and other non-free software. ![]() Do you think I should start looking into using other more powerful Raw software like DXO, Aperture, Lightroom? Would using them make a significant difference to my photos or would the Silkypix be sufficient. GH1 is my first camera where I use a raw converter. ![]() My question for tonight is that I use Silkypix 3.1 SE that came with my GH1. I get so much tips and hints from this forum. I just want to tell you all that I love this forum. One note - since I'm a PC user, I can't comment on other Mac platform tools. I've used Lightroom since V1 and Photoshop for over a decade and highly recommend them. From there, you can add (PhotoShop for some more serious editing). It has some decent development tools, and is excellent for viewing and managing your photos. IMO, you should now invest in software.Īs a first step, I'd recommend Adobe Lightroom 3. You have something like $3,000 invested in nice hardware. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |